Timeline for How mature is real-time programming in robotics? [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
24 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:49 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://robotics.stackexchange.com/ with https://robotics.stackexchange.com/
|
|
Jun 10, 2016 at 17:17 | history | closed |
holmeski Mark Booth |
Opinion-based | |
Jun 8, 2016 at 20:41 | review | Close votes | |||
Jun 10, 2016 at 17:17 | |||||
Jun 8, 2016 at 17:02 | answer | added | user3150208 | timeline score: 0 | |
Jul 24, 2013 at 20:49 | vote | accept | Shahbaz | ||
Apr 3, 2013 at 0:22 | comment | added | hhh | Perhaps related question about dynamic programming, sorry I could not understand understand the question. It looks like this q has nothing to do with DP so asked a new question. | |
Nov 20, 2012 at 16:50 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackRobotics/status/270932383262470144 | ||
Nov 19, 2012 at 22:52 | answer | added | hauptmech | timeline score: 0 | |
Nov 9, 2012 at 1:02 | comment | added | bit-pirate | Thanks for the clarification! For me, the title was confusing. IMO real-time programming + implementation is mature in Robotics, but it involves more efforts (time, money, skill etc), so most people avoid it, when it is not really necessary. | |
Nov 8, 2012 at 13:29 | history | edited | Shahbaz | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 267 characters in body
|
Nov 8, 2012 at 13:22 | comment | added | Shahbaz | @bit-pirate, I don't understand why you say that I asked when/in which case. I never asked such a thing. Like I said The question is, how much are developers inclined to write real-time applications when real-time behavior is actually needed? In other words, what percentage of applications that do require real-time behavior, are actually implemented in real-time? I personally know when and in which case real-time behavior is needed and have absolutely no question on that matter. In fact, I am surprised to see answers explaining that. | |
Nov 8, 2012 at 12:46 | answer | added | Jay Beavers | timeline score: 2 | |
Nov 8, 2012 at 0:44 | answer | added | bit-pirate | timeline score: 0 | |
Nov 8, 2012 at 0:29 | comment | added | bit-pirate | I agree with @hauptmech. The questions is confusing. On the top your are asking, how many people/how often real-time systems are used and later on your asking when/in which case. Both are good questions, so please split it into two or reduce to one. Thanks! | |
Nov 7, 2012 at 20:34 | answer | added | Joe | timeline score: 2 | |
Oct 27, 2012 at 11:49 | comment | added | Shahbaz | @hauptmech, well ROS certainly can't be used for real-time, since it's not! | |
Oct 27, 2012 at 9:29 | answer | added | hauptmech | timeline score: 2 | |
Oct 27, 2012 at 9:23 | comment | added | hauptmech | I think this is a great question. Consider splitting it into two and clarifying your main question. 'Can ROS be used for real-time?' or 'Is ROS used with real-time?' (2 different questions) are separate from your main question. | |
Oct 25, 2012 at 20:45 | answer | added | Mark Booth | timeline score: 10 | |
Oct 25, 2012 at 18:26 | answer | added | Crake | timeline score: 2 | |
Oct 25, 2012 at 13:38 | answer | added | Rocketmagnet | timeline score: 9 | |
Oct 25, 2012 at 11:42 | history | edited | Shahbaz | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 370 characters in body
|
Oct 25, 2012 at 10:27 | answer | added | ronalchn | timeline score: 4 | |
Oct 25, 2012 at 9:49 | history | asked | Shahbaz | CC BY-SA 3.0 |