Timeline for What are the reasons for not having autonomous robots in our daily activities?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2013 at 13:59 | comment | added | WildCrustacean | @DrD I would also argue that chess is a very constrained environment with a relatively small set of rules compared to the site of a natural disaster. | |
| Jan 12, 2013 at 23:50 | comment | added | DaemonMaker | While processing power is a limitation it is not the only one. We still have a lot to learn about building intelligent systems. Take your examples. First, agents like Deep Blue and Watson have massive amounts of processing power but they are highly specialized and incapable of addressing general problems (i.e. the complexity of the world). RHex on the other hand is highly capable of autonomously dealing with complex terrain with very little processing power. This is an example of what I like to call physical or mechanical intelligence. Check out the work Dr. Rolf Pfeifer for more detail. | |
| Jan 12, 2013 at 22:41 | comment | added | Dr D | Thanks for the answer DaemonMaker, artificial intelligence won the chess match against Garry Kasparov. Can we conclude that we are limited in processing power on a mobile machine, not really the intelligence? But, RHex from Boston Dynamics can run for 6 hours and its video is astonishing. Though, I am not sure if it is running completely autonomously. | |
| Jan 12, 2013 at 20:32 | history | answered | DaemonMaker | CC BY-SA 3.0 |