# Tag Info

7

The answer is 'yes'. A more detailed answer likely depends on how you define "robotics". But generally, robotics applications are considered to require a very broad spectrum of knowledge. So while most robotics includes some form of mechanical function, you could easily specialize in artificial intelligence, microcontroller design, or any number of ...

6

In short, what you are trying to do is well beyond the capabilities of top robotics research labs. That said, here is a short list of general areas you need to look into: Robotic arm dynamics (to swing the racket) Vision processing to track the shuttle Shuttle dynamics to predict shuttle path (this is not well studying so you would most likely have to ...

5

2 kgs is not very much, so i would probably consider arms that are slightly less industrial than Kuka, ABB, Fanuc, Denso and the like. However, 1.6m is pretty long and that may be hard to find in non-industrial arms. Keep in mind there are many other factors to consider when choosing a robot arm. human safety, accuracy, repeat-accuracy, speed, workspace ...

5

The torque bandwidth is typically referring to the maximum frequency of motion at which the actuator can provide that torque. So your actuator can provide a peak torque of 100 Nm, as in it can hold up a weight of 100 N held at a torque arm of 1 m. If you want to swing that weight back and forth you could do it at up to 4 Hz, but no faster without damaging or ...

5

There are 2 main reasons why the MER is still operating long after it's 90 Sol planned lifetime. The first is political, strategic, and can be summarized as 'Under promise, over deliver'. When a PI (principal investigator) proposes a high-risk scientific mission like this, they always frame the goals of the project such that their project is viewed ...

4

Working in robotics doesn't mean that you must understand (or enjoy) all the relevant disciplines. It simply means that you must understand that you are one part of a team that produces a robotic system. On the other hand, what skills you have will determine which teams will find you valuable as a member -- smaller teams require everyone to bring multiple ...

4

Whether a single 3-way, 2-position pneumatic valve (typically with a work port, an input port, and an exhaust port ‒ see page 3 of nationalpneumatic.com's pdf about valves) will suffice depends on information not given in the question. For example, if you can turn the compressor on or off at will, and if it will hold pressure when off, you can attach the ...

4

For most applications, I think the calculation you describe is good enough when selecting hardware. You want your arm to be able to have some lift capacity at the worst case, which is when the arm is fully extended. Note that you should also take into account the weight of the arm itself which is typically non-negligible. That being said, yes, there are ...

4

So this is summary...Open to discussions or edits... | Mechanism | Precision | Friction | Max length | Max force | |--------------------| ----------|----------|------------|-----------| | rack and pinion | low | high | unlimited | high | | lead screw | high | mid | limited | high | | ball screw | ...

4

The video shows 2 linear actuators driving a universal joint through ball and socket joints.

3

What about using a simple RC-servo with a rotating cam that holds one pod. When rotating down It would drop the pod it is holding. When rotating up, it would lift the whole stack for one pod height and allow the bottom pod to drop into the cam's holding space.

3

I assume that your 2 channels control forward/backward and left/right. But even if the 2 channels control forward/backward in each wheel (differential-drive style), it should still be possible to do what you are suggesting electrically instead of mechanically. You should be able to read the input signal to the motors, decide whether those signals are ...

3

Rotary mowers are mechanically simpler, so cheaper to make. The rotary mower is more tolerant of getting dull, and if you run over something like small trees or rocks, the blades take less damage, and the motor is harder to jam and stall. The blades are also easier to sharpen. For this simplicity, you get a poorer cut, and more grass damage. I do agree, ...

3

In my personal experience, I hate Google SketchUp. I Recommend that you use CAD Solidworks. Google SketchUp is not meant for gear design. In Solidworks, you are able to create gears however you may and also make it function on a three-dimensional visual on your computer screen. *I personally recommend this to you with great honestly.

3

I think there might be different reasons for this. First, historical reasons The first systems with haptic feedback were mechanical systems to which vibration / force feedback functions were added (vibrations in a pilot's handle, for instance). In the early stages robotic systems were used as haptic displays for different uses (quite early, force feedback ...

3

For your first example, Max-Weight = Torque/arm-length. Going beyond that, there are several software applications and API's out there that can be a big help for these kinds of calculations (matlab or pyODE to name a couple), but they will be pretty useless without a decent understanding of what you are computing. A good resource to learn about the mechanics ...

3

Books FIRST and VEX are fairly large competitions, so it should come as no surprise that people have literally written books on how to participate. My favorite book aimed at FTC is FTC Robotics: Tips, Tricks, Strategies, and Secrets. They've made several editions of this book; although it's not a structured curriculum, it is a great guide and a must have ...

3

I don't think they're proposing building a compressor for use in refrigeration. They're proposing a solid-state cooler/heat pump based on the elastocaloric effect: As the shape memory alloy block is strained, it gets hot. This heat would be extracted - I guess by blowing air through the device to somewhere outside the refrigerator? The air flow is then ...

3

Going forward, a Klann linkage has a near-vertical leg drop action. (See the legs at left in the wikipedia animated GIF.) It has a near-vertical leg lift action if running in reverse. (See the legs at right in the illustration.) Note, this linkage and some other leg mechanism linkages use a rotary crank; ie, rather than using a 180° back-and-forth motor, ...

3

If I understand correctly, you are referring to when the robot spins and the rack remains stationary (dynamic motions involving the rack mass seem to be slow as you would expect with such a high COM). In this case only the kinematics are important. It's important that the rotational axis of the wheels and the rotational axis of the rack-support are ...

3

They are parallel manipulators. You may find chapters on parallel manipulators in robotics textbooks, for example, A Mathematical Introduction to Robotic Manipulation, useful. There are also a number of articles related to kinematics analysis of those manipulators (such as this article).

3

I will try not to skip too many steps. Assuming a Global coordinate frame at the base and the arm is fully extended along the Y-axis of the base frame. Since SCARA has four joints, we will create four 6D spatial vectors (screws) ${ξ}_{i}$ with respect to a global coordinate frame. Keep in mind that all spatial vectors are described with respect to the ...

3

Looks like it uses a propane powered ram to launch itself into the air. The end of the piston is visible in the back of the vehicle. This webpage states that source of power is battery and propane https://bostondynamics.com/sandflea Also found this patent for a combustion powered linear actuator. https://patents.google.com/patent/US7263955B1/en

3

This is called a Stewart platform. You can use any linear actuator type, hydraulic, pneumatic or electric.

3

We can think of "jitter" as a fairly quick, fairly small perturbation upon the intended controlled behavior. A semi-quantitative design guideline (like "within 5%") needs a numerator and denominator. An arm that is supposed to move 20 cm allowing 1 cm wobble (5% of the distance) sounds pretty sloppy. A controller that overshoots by 5% ...

2

It sounds like you're describing a linear actuator with a pressure sensor (or strain gauge) attached to the end. To bridge that system across bluetooth, you may want to check out one of several microcontrollers -- look for bluetooth modules, a motor (or servo) controller, and analog inputs (to read the strain gauge).

2

Robotics is by definition a subject rooted in mechanics and if you "hate" this subject then surely there will always be an large part of this industry that you "hate". So I would suggest you review either: a. What you mean by "I hate mechanics" or "the mechanical side" b. Understand what you like about Robotics because in the end all of the work is ...

2

Based on your requirements, I would recommend the UR5 (0.85m range, 5kg payload) or UR10 (1.3 m range, 10kg payload) from Universal Robotics. Have a friend who has used it for work, and it performs well. It may be overkill on the payload, but it is the only one I would recommend! Would use ROS industrial to drive it.

2

Generally you won't need a servo. The more common way to throttle a flow is to use pneumatic solenoid valves (which are either open or closed) and control them with PWM. See (for example) this link. This is also how the boost controller in many cars works.

2

Hmm, thats definitely a unique idea. I think the shape of the top gear would have to be rounded off like half of a torus so it maintains a good interlocking through the motion from parallel to 90 degrees. Also, the motion that the top shaft/gear go through during that transition might not be a simple rotation...it might be a rotation + translation. I'm just ...

Only top voted, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible