I'm an Electronics student taking a module in Robotics.

From the example,

Example from lecture notes

I understand line 1 as the Jacobian is found from the time derivative of the kinematics equation and such relates joint angles to velocity.

I do not understand why the transpose has been taken on line 3 and how line 4 is produced.

  • $\begingroup$ Can you provide more detail? Is $J$ the Jacobian or is it moment of inertia? Is $m$ mass or something different? What is $q$? $\endgroup$ – Chuck Apr 30 '16 at 23:54
  • $\begingroup$ Unfortunately this is my problem, this is the lecture slide as given, so this is as much information as I have sorry! $\endgroup$ – LazyMoggy May 2 '16 at 11:04
  • $\begingroup$ Since this came from a slide, your best bet might be to ask the person who presented the slide. $\endgroup$ – Ian May 3 '16 at 21:12

How the third equation is used in the derivation would be helpful in order to explain why $\delta x$ is being transposed. But when you take $$\delta x = J \delta q$$ and transpose it, you must reverse the order of the terms of the right hand side. This makes sense if you consider the dimensions of $J$. If $x \in \Re^n$ and $q \in \Re^m$ then $J$ is $n$ x $m$. To postmultiply $q^T$ (which is 1 x $m$) you must transpose $J$.

The fourth equation is just a statement that the seesaw is in equilibrium - the total moment is zero.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.