0
$\begingroup$

I'm stuck on equation 4.30 of page 176 in
http://www.cds.caltech.edu/~murray/books/MLS/pdf/mls94-complete.pdf

This equation:
$\frac {\partial M_{ij}} {\partial \theta_k} = \sum_{l=\max(i,j)}^n \Bigl( [A_{ki} \xi_i, \xi_k]^T A_{lk}^T {\cal M}_l' A_{lj} \xi_j + \xi_i^T A_{li}^T {\cal M}_l' A_{lk} [A_{kj} \xi_j, \xi_k] \Bigr)$

seems impossible to process because it requires adding a 2x1 to a 1x2 matrix. going by ROWSxCOLUMNS notation. Matrices M and A are 6x6 and $\xi$ is a 6x1, so how does this addition statement fit the rules of matrix addition? This must be my mistake, I just don't see how.

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

The Lie Bracket is 6x1, not 6x2, so both terms should be 1x1.

| improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ please explain Lie Bracket. Are your saying $[A_{ki} \xi_i, \xi_k]$ is not a concatenation of two 6x1 matrices? How does it work? @SteveO $\endgroup$ – Drew Apr 19 '16 at 4:17
  • $\begingroup$ I think your text explains it quite well in section 3.3, "Robot dynamics and the product of exponentials formula" just prior to equation 4.30. The Lie Bracket is a sort of gradient measure. The mathematical purists will hate that description! $\endgroup$ – SteveO Apr 19 '16 at 4:23
  • $\begingroup$ And yes, it is not a concatenation. $\endgroup$ – SteveO Apr 19 '16 at 4:24
  • $\begingroup$ Oh shoot, Lie brackets are explained in the preceding page. Ok, thanks SteveO $\endgroup$ – Drew Apr 19 '16 at 4:24

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.