0
$\begingroup$

Rosanswers logo

I want to create an inexpensive testbed for multirobot experiments. In order to do this within my budget, I plan to centralize as much of the sensing and computation expense as possible: a single computer communicating with each robot wirelessly, and overhead kinect providing position and obstacle information.

For the robots themselves, I'm thinking something like Pololu's m3pi coupled with an XBee. My goal is to spend as little time as possible futzing with the hardware getting it to the point where it reacts to geometry_msgs/Twist messages. Does anybody here have any experience (or better yet, tutorials!) integrating a system like this into ROS? Do you know of other hardware that better suits my needs? Requirements:

  • Small: < 6" diameter
  • Cheap: < $200 each
  • off-the-shelf: I'm not really interested in designing my own robot and hacking it together with an arduino or Raspberry Pi, but that's an option of last resort …

I've seen these previous questions, and this list, but didn't find anything ideal.


Originally posted by lindzey on ROS Answers with karma: 1780 on 2013-06-01

Post score: 5

$\endgroup$

2 Answers 2

0
$\begingroup$

Rosanswers logo

Have you looked into sphero? It is small, somewhat expensive for what you get ($130), but fully controllable out-of-the-box and readily available.

There are some ROS packages available (sphero_ros and ARL_sphero_command), but I do not know the maturity or activity level of either of these projects.


Originally posted by Jeremy Zoss with karma: 4976 on 2013-06-01

This answer was ACCEPTED on the original site

Post score: 4


Original comments

Comment by lindzey on 2013-06-01:
Interesting! I think my main concern with this would be my ability to localize it sufficiently well. For a wheeled robot, I'd use some combination of odometry / cmd_vel history + motion model / April tag tracked by the overhead kinect. Does anybody know how well Sphero does at this out of the box?

Comment by mjcarroll on 2013-06-03:
I think localization based purely on Sphero sensors would be very difficult, but if you have an overhead Kinect, and the ability to control the Sphero illumination color, it may make for a very easy target to track.

Comment by lindzey on 2013-06-03:
Oh! duh! I'm very wary of the robustness of color-only tracking algorithms, but combined with extracting spheres from the depth image that should allow tracking multiple spheros at once =) Anyways - I've ordered one, and plan to play with it. (I'm also still in search of better options!)

Comment by mjcarroll on 2013-06-04:
You also may be able to just get an Arduino powered platform with the zigbee, especially if you aren't planning on doing to much sensing on board.

Comment by lindzey on 2013-06-04:
@mjcarroll 1) Post this as an actual answer? 2) Do you have a particular platform in mind? (My goal is to absolutely minimize hardware hacking, and I haven't seen anything yet, but there's a lot out there)

Comment by Cerin on 2014-09-12:
Are there any "real" tech specs for Sphero? That webpage is the worst marketing junk I've ever seen. All it seems to be is a glorified bluetooth receiver attached to a couple of motors. Without sensors of any kind, how is it useful for robotics?

Comment by Jeremy Zoss on 2014-09-12:
Have you checked the API docs? Yes, it's simplistic, but I think multi-robot control using overhead camera and different-colored spheros would be pretty easy to jump in and get started. Like this.

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

Rosanswers logo

I guess if your whole goal was to minimize unit cost, I would consider something like this: http://www.robotshop.com/dfrobot-2wd-miniq-arduino-compatible-kit-5.html

It has motors and encoders, which is he minimum that you need to implement closed loop motor speed control on-board. Includes an ATMega328, and has a spot for zigbee.


Originally posted by mjcarroll with karma: 6414 on 2013-06-04

This answer was NOT ACCEPTED on the original site

Post score: 1

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.