0
$\begingroup$

Rosanswers logo

When using smach with actionlib actions, am I correct in saying that smach acts as the action client for the action server? So I don't need a separate action client anymore?


Originally posted by Homer Manalo on ROS Answers with karma: 475 on 2011-02-27

Post score: 3

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

0
$\begingroup$

Rosanswers logo

That is correct, if you use a simple action state Smach will construct the action client for you.

Similarly, when you create a action server wrapper for a Smach container, Smach will construct the action server for you.


Originally posted by Wim with karma: 2915 on 2011-02-28

This answer was ACCEPTED on the original site

Post score: 5

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.