0
$\begingroup$

Gazebo Answers logo

it appears to me that there is a performance regression in the plugin update (publishing) rate in ROS fuerte compared to gazebo in ROS electric. I already posted a detailed description on answers.ros.org: http://answers.ros.org/question/43960/publishing-rate-of-gazebo-sensor-plugins-broken-on-fuerte/ but failed to get an answer so far.

Basically, on electric data is output to ROS topics as expected, while the data is published with high jitter and much lower than desired rate in fuerte. I'm not sure this has been the case from the start, if this a recent performance regression, or if I'm doing something wrong. Whatever it is, the current state is unusable for sensor simulation. Any suggestions are much appreciated.

System is Ubuntu 11.10 AMD64, electric and fuerte from .debs (up to date), Nvidia proprietary drivers


Originally posted by nkoenig on Gazebo Answers with karma: 7676 on 2012-09-19

Post score: 0

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

0
$\begingroup$

Gazebo Answers logo

sorry, this must have fallen off the treadmill at some point. I took a brief look, and SensorManager::Update() inlines image rendering update with the laser sensor update. I think splitting up the two updates into separate thereads should solve this issue.

See ticket.


Originally posted by nkoenig with karma: 7676 on 2012-09-19

This answer was ACCEPTED on the original site

Post score: 0

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.