0
$\begingroup$

I have a question related to the superposition in state space equation. Suppose I have a state space equation below \begin{equation} \frac{d}{dt}X = AX + B\begin{vmatrix} u_1(t)\\ u_2(t) \\ \end{vmatrix} \end{equation} where X is the state vector, A, B are constant matrixes. u is the input time varying signals.

Now assume u can be expressed as \begin{equation} u_1(t) = c_1\cos(w_1t)+c_2\cos(w_2t)\\ u_2(t) = d_1\cos(w_1t)+d_2\cos(w_2t)\\ \end{equation} where c1, c2, d1, d2 are constant coefficients, and w1 and w2 are different.

Can I rewrite the state space equation into the following two equations: \begin{equation} \frac{d}{dt}X_1 = AX_1 + B\begin{vmatrix} c_1\cos(w_1t)\\ d_1\cos(w_1t) \\ \end{vmatrix} \end{equation} and \begin{equation} \frac{d}{dt}X_2 = AX_2 + B\begin{vmatrix} c_2\cos(w_2t)\\ d_2\cos(w_2t) \\ \end{vmatrix} \end{equation}

And then I solve for time-domain steady state expression for X1 and X2. The final time domain expression for X would be \begin{equation} X = X_1+X_2 \end{equation}

Is there anything wrong with this method?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

That's correct!

It's the magic of linear systems.

Find it also on Wikipedia.

$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ One does need to ensure that the initial conditions also satisfy $X(t_0)=X_1(t_0)+X_2(t_0)$. $\endgroup$
    – fibonatic
    Jun 8, 2022 at 9:52
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, definitely, which basically enforces a constraint on one of the substates $X_i(t_0)$ since we're initially given with $X(t_0)$. $\endgroup$ Jun 8, 2022 at 10:04

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.