# Multiplication of rotation matrix help

I'm Watching Angela Sodemann video on 6DOF robots and am following her example, but I'm getting a different answer for my R3_6 matrix and I'm not sure where I'm going wrong. She uses this as her example robot:

She doesn't give her DH Table so I came up with this for the last three joints:

Using the homogenous transformation matrix, I came up with the following rotation matrices for the last three joints:

I believe both of those are correct. I think my issue is just in multiplying the matrices. My understanding is to multiply two matrices you multiply every column in each row by every row in each column and sum them:

R_35[0][0] = (R_34[0][0] * R_45[0][0]) + (R_34[0][1] * R_45[1][0]) + (R_34[0][2] * R_45[2][0])
R_35[0][1] = (R_34[0][0] * R_45[0][1]) + (R_34[0][1] * R_45[1][1]) + (R_34[0][2] * R_45[2][1])
R_35[0][2] = (R_34[0][0] * R_45[0][2]) + (R_34[0][1] * R_45[1][2]) + (R_34[0][2] * R_45[2][2])
... and so on


From this I get the following matrices:

My end result is only correct in a few places. Can anyone spot where I'm going wrong?

Note: Several People In the comments have said R1 should be S5S6. Not sure who is correct on that.

• Replace (R_34[0][2] * R_45[1][1]) as (R_34[0][1] * R_45[1][2]) in the code on R_35[0][2] Commented Oct 15, 2021 at 12:44
• Oops, that was a typo in the question and not representative of how I got my R35 and R36 matrices Commented Oct 15, 2021 at 18:07
• I've spent a lot more time on trying to figure this out, coded a little tool to multiply matrices of strings together so I don't have to do it by hand and I always come up with that same answer for R35 and R36. I must be incorrect on thinking my DH table is correct or am doing something fundamentally wrong. Commented Oct 15, 2021 at 18:13

after spending 3-4 hours i successfully found the mistake

first i multiplied the R3_6 by hand and checked the matrix. it came as same as yours, varying from the angela sodemann's R3_6.

after several attempts i decided to define rotation matrices by myself ,and later found that R3_4 is provided here is wrong!

then i calculated all rotation matrices R3_4, R4_5 AND R5_6 and then multiplied to get R3_6 and got the same matrix as angela sodemann { R3_6 (1) (2) is s5s6 as others mentioned }

I also checked my R3_6 matrix. written in python and compared it to the rotation matrix part of the homegeneous transformation eqn and both are same

the rotation matric R3_4(That i mentioned wrong) is not for the kinematic diagram that you mentioned in the question, if you compare your image in question and below attached image you will find the difference on 3rd frame, where she used this diagram to teach n another video.

link for that video where she calculates R3_4