4
$\begingroup$

I have the pose at times t - 1 and time t. We are given: that the the new pose, at time t, is

$$x_{t - 1} = [0,0,pi/6]$$ $$x_{t} = [0.2,0.1,(11*pi)/60]$$

(Where the vectors are [x, y, theta] with respect to some world frame.)

In my head, I have the two poses. I just need to calculate the difference of the two and that'll be odometry, right? So, subtracting the two vectors: [0.2,0.1,(11*pi)/60] - [0,0,pi/6] = [.2, .1, pi/60]

However, according to the answer checker that doesn't seem to be the right approach. Can someone suggest a strategy to go about this?

Improve this question
$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ What is your robot, and what do you mean by odometry? In general, you can’t get odometry from poses without a motion model — e.g., did you get between the poses by sliding and spinning, by driving with constant turning and forward velocities, or take a more meandering path? $\endgroup$
    – RLH
    Apr 1, 2020 at 22:42
  • $\begingroup$ If you are just trying to find the difference in poses w.r.t. time, the do as you have done and divide by the change in time. Odometry is a term typically applied to two different processes. You are getting at one, but @RLH is getting at the other, which is that odemetry information is used to estimate position. $\endgroup$
    – koverman47
    Apr 3, 2020 at 21:16
  • $\begingroup$ @koverman47 I've only ever seen "odometry" in the sense of mapping actuator motions through physical constraints to vehicle-body motions. If there's another sense of "odometry" floating around, I'd very much like to know what it is -- do you have a reference you can point me at? $\endgroup$
    – RLH
    Apr 4, 2020 at 1:14
  • $\begingroup$ (There is also "visual odometry", but that just replaces the "actuator velocity -> constraints -> body velocity" sequence with "observed visual flow -> constraint that world elements are rigidly fixed to each other -> inferred body velocity" sequence, and doesn't incorporate direct pose measurements) $\endgroup$
    – RLH
    Apr 4, 2020 at 1:26

2 Answers 2

Reset to default
2
$\begingroup$

Those POSEs are not 3D vectors or a 3D coordinate point. As such you can't subtract.

A pose is a state vector, and the last value is an angle.

From this, how can you calculate odometry?

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ So using the distance, would the x-cord be 0.2236*cos(pi/60), y-cord = 0.2236*sin(pi/60), and theta = pi/60? $\endgroup$
    – BigBen
    Apr 1, 2020 at 19:55
1
$\begingroup$

Assume you are in a 2D grid.
At time x(t-1), we have the first pose as p_1 = [x_1, y_1, theta_1] and
at time x(t), we have the second pose as p_2 = [x_2, y_2, theta_2].

The distance traveled could be calculated using the Euclidean distance formula as in your case would be:

Distance = Sqrt[(0.2-0)^2 + (0.1-0)^2] = 0.2236.

And the angle traversed would be the difference between theta_2 and theta_1, so we have theta = Pi/60.

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ So using the distance, would the x-cord be 0.2236*cos(pi/60), y-cord = 0.2236*sin(pi/60), and theta = pi/60? $\endgroup$
    – BigBen
    Apr 1, 2020 at 17:39

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.