0
$\begingroup$

I've been asked to show that if a manipular is at a singular configuration, then the End Effector wrench can be balanced without any joint torques.

I know that t = J*F where (t = torques, F= end effector forces, J is the Jacobian). Hence F = (pinv(J))*t. Hence, if J is singular, then we cannot invert it and find F, as the inverse of J is effectively infinity.

Here however, I basically have been asked to show that there is 0 torque for any end effector wrench F. Which is similar to Ax=0

How would I proceed?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Why does singular imply Ax=0? Shouldn’t that be the derivative? $\endgroup$ – SteveO Feb 18 at 1:26
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Also , should not be transpose(J) * F = \tau ? $\endgroup$ – jdios Feb 18 at 8:03
  • $\begingroup$ What is $Ax=0$ ? is it like state space stuff? $\dot{x} = Ax + B$ ? Or is it the Task-space inertia matrix? When a robot is singular it loses a DoF to my understanding. Given how you mention pseudo inverse $J^\dagger$ should I suspect that your robot is kinematically redundant? If that's the case - then maybe what you are talking about relates to the null space? $\endgroup$ – Spaceman Feb 22 at 23:06

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.