I have read a robotic related paper called Estimating SE(3) elements using a dual quaternion based linear Kalman filter, and the author proposed that the equation of position measurement is denoted as:


where $\mathbf{a}$ is the sensor measurement, $\mathbf{R}$ ∈ SO(3) is the rotation matrix, $\mathbf{b}$$\mathbf{R}^{3}$is the point to be transformed and $\mathbf{t}$$\mathbf{R}^{3}$ is the translation vector. In an application such as rigid registration of images, $\mathbf{a}$ is the sensed location of points and $\mathbf{b}$ is the corresponding point on the CAD model of the object.

The equation of pose measurement is denoted as:


where $\mathbf{A,B}$ are pose-measurements, and the $\mathbf{X}$ is the desired transformation to be estimated.

So is there anyone who know what the difference between pose measurement and position measurement?


2 Answers 2


referring to your equation $$ \boldsymbol{a}=\boldsymbol{Rb}+\boldsymbol{t} ,$$ the position measurement would be $\boldsymbol{t}$ whilst the orientation measurement would be $\boldsymbol{R}$. These quantities can be obtained in different ways, e.g. position could be measured using GPS while orientation could be obtained using an IMU. I hope this helps,

P.S. feel free to ask further details, I've written my master thesis about a similar estimator.


what you are looking for is written in the paper. Position refers only to x,y,z translational measurements while pose means position and orientation.

  • $\begingroup$ Yeah, you're right ! Thanks for your reply ! $\endgroup$
    – Jay Lee
    Nov 24, 2019 at 14:19
  • $\begingroup$ @Jay Lee If this answer has solved your problem, please mark it as 'accepted' by clicking the green check. $\endgroup$ Dec 3, 2019 at 19:20

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.