0
$\begingroup$

I am currently designing a 2D simulation of a 3DOFs robotic arm in order to develop a better understanding of inverse kinematic (so as to avoid breaking more components than necessary) but despite my numerous readings I still cannot figure out how apply it to my arm.

I tried to represent my arm joints as a combination of three circle radiuses, or using complex exponential form (I did a very simple modelization using Geogebra), but no matter the method I can't figure out how to constrain my problem.

During my research I came across this blog: Inverse kinematics of 3-link arm with constrained minimization in Python and I found the solution really elegant, but even if it feels logical, I don't understand it.

What's the math behind it? Is it based on Lagrange multiplier?

What I understand is that we want to find the appropriate combination of three angles so that the end effector of our robot ends up at the right position. I understand there are infinitely many solutions among which we want to pick the one that suits us the best, but I don't understand how.

Could you please explain me the method used in this blog?

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

The referenced blog is called studywolf, and apart from the inverse kinematics problem ,it provides a large variety of robotics tutorials and i have it own my own watchlist as well. To the problem of the IK solver itself: the question goes into the right direction. Creating a model and visualizing it, is the first important step in robotics engineering. What the studywolf blog has described is a sequential least squares method, which was introduced in a forum post at robotics.SE a while ago.[1] The goal is to find the minimum of a function.

Another option for approaching the IK problem is the mentioned Lagrange technique.[2] It is similar to Gradient Descent [3] an optimization method for solving a system of equations.

[1] Least square method https://robotics.stackexchange.com/a/15451/14283

[2] Lagrange https://robotics.stackexchange.com/a/10258/14283

[3] Gradient Descent Solving Inverse Kinematics with Gradient Descent

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks a lot and sorry for the late reply, I started reading through it and it seems really interesting ! $\endgroup$ – Caribou123 May 22 at 19:45

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.