I'm starting to attempt to fly FPV on my quadrotor. I am using a FrSky D8R-II 2.4 GHz frequency hopping diversity receiver (two antennas) for control and recently added a no-name 910 MHz 1.5 watt analog video transmitter for FPV flying:

enter image description here

When the video transmitter is powered up, my control range drops from about 1.5km to under 50m. I'm surprised that the 910 MHz video channel affects my 2.4 GHz control channel this way.

Is this sort of interference expected? Is it because my transmitter is low quality? What changes are recommended — should I switch to a UHF control radio? Or a different frequency (eg 5.8 GHz?) for the video radio? Or just try moving it a few more inches (they are already about 5in apart)?

  • $\begingroup$ Are you sure both transmitters are getting enough power? $\endgroup$ – DaemonMaker Jul 11 '13 at 19:36
  • $\begingroup$ I think the real question you're asking is "how do I debug a difference in control range that happens when I use this other transmitter simultaneously?" If that's the case, would you edit your question? If not, what is your proof that RF interference causes this problem? $\endgroup$ – Ian Jul 11 '13 at 19:44
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @DaemonMaker: quite sure. They are running off of separate batteries. $\endgroup$ – foobarbecue Jul 11 '13 at 19:57
  • $\begingroup$ @Ian, the FrSky system makes it pretty easy to evaluate changes in effective range. It has a system of beeps that tell you when your RSSI is low and when you lose signal entirely. It also has a range test mode, but I'm not using that. I just walk away with the R/C controller and I can go a long way away when the video TX is not powered, but only tens of meters when the video TX is powered until the FrSky says signal weak and then lost. $\endgroup$ – foobarbecue Jul 11 '13 at 19:59
  • $\begingroup$ It looks like you're not the only one to experience this problem. $\endgroup$ – Ian Jul 12 '13 at 2:26

There's a lot of things that this could be.

The transmitter could be faulty, and transmitting considerable power close enough to 2.4GHz to be directly interfering with the receiver. Yes, the receiver is spread-spectrum, but interference to such a receiver will generally raise its noise floor, which will reduce its range.

The receiver could be faulty; it's front end could be getting swamped by the 910MHz. This would reduce the effective gain of the receiver front end, which would also result in low range.

There's even a slight chance that the problem is neither one, but some other bit of electronics: the 910MHz signal could be getting rectified by some component in a servo or other bit of electronics. This would generate signal at 1.82GHz, 2.73GHz and more -- that 2.73GHz signal, if it's strong enough, could cause issues with your 2.4GHz receiver.

A rough test of which is which would be to unhook one or the other from the quadcopter, then increase the separation between them while you see how the signal strength, or range, looks on the 2.4GHz receiver. If the range of the 2.4GHz receiver rises rapidly with separation, or shows some threshold effect where it is low, low, low, HIGH, then there's a good chance that the problem is that the 2.4GHz receiver is allowing itself to be stomped on by the out-of-band energy from the transmitter. If the range of the 2.4GHz receiver rises gradually and smoothly as you back away from the video transmitter, then the problem could be in either radio but is most likely in the transmitter.

In an ideal world both the receiver and the video transmitters would be inside of metal boxes, with bandpass filters right at the point of entry or exit for the RF signal that only let the correct frequencies through. Those metal boxes would weigh nothing, of course.

Alas, this is the real world. I'm not sure if it'd be worthwhile to try the metal box idea -- the required filters are hard to debug without a spectrum analyzer; you can put one together and see if it works, but if it doesn't you still won't know for sure if a filter isn't the answer, or if that particular filter didn't do the job for you.

The (US) Amateur Radio Relay League has a book called the "Radio Interference Handbook". The book is aimed at amateur radio operators who are having problems with their neighbors -- but much of what it'll have to say should be pertinent to your case.


I can say positively that 900Mhz china video transmitters can affect 2.4Ghz frequency range. I experienced this first hand and confirmed interference on my spectrum analyzer, it can cause harmonics on the 2.4Ghz but when the tx and rx are close it appears to have an affect on the noise floor too, using those low pass filter don't seem to help close range either.

  • $\begingroup$ Thanks... I was considering a low pass filter. Useful to know that's not likely to work. $\endgroup$ – foobarbecue Jan 25 '14 at 14:32
  • $\begingroup$ My first thought was harmonic interference from a noisy device. $\endgroup$ – ChuckCottrill Jan 30 '14 at 18:57

I hesitated to provide this answer, because I can't find directly relevant articles to back it up.

It's possible that the video transmitter (even though it's on a separate frequency) is saturating the receiver for the controls. If this is the case, you'll have to find some way to reduce this. There are a few possibilites:

  1. Increase the distance between the antennas. On a quadrotor, this can only be taken so far.
  2. Change the distance between the antennas to a 1/2 or 1/4 wavelength of the interfering signal.
  3. Change the orientation of the antennas to interfere less — use a 90° offset.

In any of these cases, you'll be better off if you can directly measure the interference signal instead of relying on the audible beeps to gauge the signal level.

  • $\begingroup$ What about adding a signal booster to my 2.4ghz control transmitter? Is that likely to help? $\endgroup$ – foobarbecue Jul 14 '13 at 2:38
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ If the problem is the one I'm describing, it's that your receiver is already picking up too much power -- so boosting your control transmitter probably wouldn't help. $\endgroup$ – Ian Jul 14 '13 at 14:31

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.