2
$\begingroup$

A robotic system is moving a getting its current location using visual odometry (incremental estimation of rotation and translation). To correct its localization, a loop closure technique may be added. However, this technique based on image comparison is costly. I want to find a way to only use this technique of loop closure only when a potential loop closure is present. Is there a way to use the $x$ and $y$ coordinates of the vehicle provided by visual odometry to say that based on their values a loop closure may have occured?

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

You can of course check if the robot is close to a prior position and looking in a similar direction (after he had moved away from this position sufficiently). But if your odometry was reliable enough to do this, you wouldn't really need loop closing. Loop closing was invented for exactly the reason that you cannot trust your odometry over a long time.

| improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ So instead of that, I rather have to run the loop closing algo every 10 images for example? The problem is that the algo I'm using is not very robust against false positives. I wanted to check that it is really a loop closing using visual odometry data $\endgroup$ – Daphnee Jan 3 '18 at 15:41
0
$\begingroup$

Well, there is an old solution that finds a possible loop closure by a growing uncertainty of the current location which was popular in EKF based SLAMs. In such way, you can reduce the number of the candidates for the place recognition. But I guess trajectory only is probably not enough for a loop closure unless you assume a special situation.

| improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
-1
$\begingroup$

I think you should go for iterative closest point algorithm. This algorithm is used for detecting loop closing. This is not very reliable but still it work well. You can check this link Visual navigation for flying Robots

| improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I think you haven't understood ICP correctly. ICP is a way to align two pointclouds which are already(!) quite well aligned as it's doing only a local optimization. $\endgroup$ – FooTheBar Aug 7 '18 at 12:09
  • $\begingroup$ I understand ICP is used to find the similar location that robot revisited if I have only odometer data. ICP is a technique of scan matching. Am I not correct? $\endgroup$ – Encipher Aug 7 '18 at 15:31

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.