3
$\begingroup$

While formulating a state matrix of a system, say a system of a typical cruise controller, \begin{equation} \begin{bmatrix} \dot{v} \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} -\frac{b}{m} \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} v \end{bmatrix} + \begin{bmatrix} -\frac{1}{m} \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} u \end{bmatrix} \end{equation} \begin{equation} y = \begin{bmatrix} 1 \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} v \end{bmatrix} \end{equation} If we consider $b = 0$ (negligible), then does this state space matrix make sense any more and is it viable? A state matrix without state variable influence in equation?

$\endgroup$
8
$\begingroup$

Yes, a state matrix with zero rows and/or columns makes sense and is viable. It typically signify pure integrators in the system. In the example you give, $$ \dot{v} = -\frac{b}{m} v +\frac{1}{m} u $$ where $v$ is the speed, $u$ is the externally applied force, and $bv$ is some viscous damping force. Now if the viscous damping coefficient is zero (no retarding force acting on the object of mass $m$, the differential equation becomes $$ \dot{v} = \frac{1}{m} u $$ The $\dot{v}$ is integrated kinematically to obtain $v$, and your state-space model becomes \begin{eqnarray*} [\dot{v}] &=& [0][v] + [1/m][u] \\ y &=& [1][v] \end{eqnarray*}

Another way to look at it is to obtain the transfer function from $u$ to $y$ (the transfer function of the plant which you want to control), which becomes $$ \frac{Y}{U} = \frac{1}{m}\cdot\frac{1}{s+b/m} $$ which is a constant term ($1/m$) times a first-order lag. For $b=0$, the transfer function becomes $$ \frac{Y}{U} = \frac{1}{m}\cdot\frac{1}{s} $$ which is simply a constant term ($1/m$) times an integrator ($1/s$).

Edit: Controllability of the System

If the externally applied force is zero (i.e., $u=0$) the output of the integrator ($v$) remains constant; if $u>0$, the resulting acceleration ($\dot{v}=u/m$) is integrated "up" and the speed increases; if $u<0$, $\dot{v}$ is integrated "down" and the speed decreases. Speed, of course, is the state variable in your system. Thus, it is possible to transfer the system state from any initial state, $v(t_0)$, to any other state, $v(t_f)$, in a finite time by means of the input, irrespective of the value of $b$. So, by purely physical reasoning we can say thet the system is controllable.

Since this is a linear time-invariant system, the controllability matrix $$ \mathbf{Q} = \left[ \begin{array}{cccc} \mathbf{B} & \mathbf{A}\mathbf{B} & \cdots & \mathbf{A}^{n-1}\mathbf{B} \end{array} \right] $$ where $\mathbf{A}=[-b/m]$ is the state matrix, $\mathbf{B}=[1/m]$ is the input matrix, and $n=1$ is the number of state variables. For your system, $$ \mathbf{Q} = \mathbf{B} = \left[ \begin{array}{c} 1/m \end{array} \right] $$ i.e., a non-zero scalar which can be inverted (it is non-singular). Thus, the rank of $\mathbf{Q}$ is one, and the system is controllable.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I am pretty clear now. Can you comment on the controllability of the system if $b = 0$? I found the rank of controllability matrix is 1. $\endgroup$ – Aniket Sharma Jun 7 '17 at 16:37
  • $\begingroup$ With pleasure, @AniketSharma. I have edited by answer to comment on that. $\endgroup$ – Christo Jun 7 '17 at 17:54

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.