0
$\begingroup$

I'm working with a robotic arm and needed to compute the jacobian matrix of it in order to send torque commands. THe arm has 6 joints all revolute. After calculating the jacobian matrix from the DH parameters provided in the datasheet, I noticed that the jacobian has dependency only from the first five joints. The sixth joint corresponds to the hand which only rotates over itself. My question here is: Can the jacobian have no dependency from a joint? On which cases can this happen?

Thanks

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

The Jacobian matrix itself can sometimes not contain some joint variables. See, for example, this textbook, p.115, where they derive the Jacobian for a SCARA manipulator.

The thing is that even though the Jacobian itself does not contain, for example, the $6^\text{th}$ joint variable, that joint still can contribute to changes in position and orientation of the end-effector. Consider the equation

$$ \begin{bmatrix}v \\ \omega\end{bmatrix} = J(q)\dot{q}, $$ where $v$ and $\omega$ are the end-effector linear and angular velocities, $\dot{q}$ is the joint velocities, and $J$ is the Jacobian (in your case it should be a $6 \times 6$ matrix). If you examine closely, you can see that your $6^\text{th}$ joint can still contribute to $v$ and $\omega$ via the last (right-most) column of $J$.

A Jacobian can be seen as how each joint (velocity) contributes to the end-effector velocities. When a Jacobian does not contain some particular joint variable, it means that the joint configuration does not really affect how other joints can contribute to end-effector velocities.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, that was what I was thinking.. Thanks for the explanation. $\endgroup$ – Miguel M. Apr 3 '17 at 8:29

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.