Timeline for Basic general question about controllers
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 2015 at 20:45 | answer | added | Emmanuel | timeline score: 2 | |
| Mar 20, 2015 at 13:08 | comment | added | Ugo Pattacini | The principle is the same, instead. Of course the control can be improved, but if you provide a proper varying position profile as reference - and the controller is correctly tuned - then you'll track the velocity as well. | |
| Mar 20, 2015 at 5:35 | comment | added | Wilhelm | They are different problems to me: at the time I was interested in keeping a distance constant and control velocity. Now I need to control both. I have already tried to solve this problem with your answer but to me they are different problems | |
| Mar 19, 2015 at 22:17 | comment | added | Ugo Pattacini | Hi Dave, it seems you did not catch the take home message of my answer to the question you posted in the past :-) | |
| Mar 18, 2015 at 21:49 | vote | accept | Wilhelm | ||
| Mar 18, 2015 at 19:23 | answer | added | BarzinM | timeline score: 2 | |
| Mar 18, 2015 at 14:35 | comment | added | Malcolm | Wouldn't it be position OR velocity but not both ? I fail to see how providing a velocity profile doesn't, by default, provide a position to reach. | |
| Mar 17, 2015 at 21:48 | history | asked | Wilhelm | CC BY-SA 3.0 |