Timeline for Estimation of pitch, roll, yaw angles: synthesis of an observer or IMU?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 2020 at 20:36 | comment | added | Chuck♦ | @dtn - typo whoops. On mobile :-P | |
| May 25, 2020 at 19:25 | comment | added | ayr | An exhaustive answers. Thank you very much! P.S. Lunenburger - that's funny :-))) | |
| May 25, 2020 at 19:21 | comment | added | Chuck♦ | @dtn - I think one of the requirements for a Luenburger observer is a "linear, time invariant" (LTI) system. Entries in your A matrix aren't supposed to be time-varying. I've gotten away with it in the cases where the parameters change at a rate much different than the system dynamics (much faster or much slower). | |
| May 25, 2020 at 10:51 | comment | added | ayr | Do you know the experience of using observers if the system parameters are variable? | |
| May 22, 2020 at 19:35 | comment | added | Chuck♦ | @dtn - I don't think the observer type matters much; the particular type you choose is up to you. If the system is unobservable, it can be made observable by changing or adding to your feedbacks. | |
| May 22, 2020 at 18:06 | comment | added | ayr | And if the system is unobservable, can it be made observable? | |
| May 22, 2020 at 15:39 | comment | added | ayr | Thank you, your answer was helpful. Firstly, I learned a little more about sensors and data filtering, and secondly, about the use of observers. On this point, I have a question: what type of observer is preferable? | |
| May 22, 2020 at 13:08 | vote | accept | ayr | ||
| May 22, 2020 at 13:06 | history | answered | Chuck♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |